Method and system to remove cytokine inhibitor in patients

ABSTRACT

A method to treat cancer uses ultrapheresis, refined to remove compounds of less than 120,000 daltons molecular weight, followed by administration of replacement fluid, to stimulate the patient&#39;s immune system to attack solid tumors. In the preferred embodiment, the patient is ultrapheresed using a capillary tube ultrafilter having a pore size of 0.02 to 0.05 microns, with a molecular weight cutoff of 120,000 daltons, sufficient to filter one blood volume. The preferred replacement fluid is ultrapheresed normal plasma. The patient is preferably treated daily for three weeks, diagnostic tests conducted to verify that there has been shrinkage of the tumors, then the treatment regime is repeated. The treatment is preferably combined with an alternative therapy, for example, treatment with an anti-angiogenic compound, one or more cytokines such as TNF, gamma interferon, or IL-2, or a procoagulant compound. The treatment increases endogenous, local levels of cytokines, such as TNF. This provides a basis for an improved effect when combined with any treatment that enhances cytokine activity against the tumors, for example, treatments using alkylating agents, doxyrubicin, carboplatinum, cisplatinum, and taxol. Alternatively, the ultrapheresis treatment can be combined with local chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and/or radiation.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally in the field of enhancing an immuneresponse, and particularly relates to the removal of TNF inhibitors in apatient, such as a cancer patient, to promote inflammation and therebyinduce remission of the cancer.

This application claims priority to U.S. Ser. No. 60/164,695, filed Nov.10, 1999.

Conventional cancer therapy is based on the use of drugs and/orradiation which kills replicating cells, hopefully faster than theagents kill the patient's normal cells. Surgery is used to reduce tumorbulk, but has little impact once the cancer has metastasized. Radiationis effective only in a localized area.

The treatments can in themselves kill the patient, in the absence ofmaintenance therapy. For example, for some types of cancer, bone marrowtransplants have been used to maintain the patient following treatmentwith otherwise fatal amounts of chemotherapy. Efficacy has not beenproven for treatment of solid tumors, however. “Cocktails” of differentchemotherapeutic agents and combinations of very high doses ofchemotherapy with restorative agents, for example, granulocytemacrophage colony stimulating factor (“GM-CSF”), erythropoietin,thrombopoetin granulocyte stimulating factor, (“G-CSF”), macrophagecolony stimulating factor (“M-CSF”) and stem cell factor (“SCF”) torestore platelet and white cell levels, have been used to treataggressive cancers. Even with the supportive or restrictive therapy,side effects are severe.

Other treatments have been tried in an attempt to improve mortality andmorbidity. Vaccines to stimulate the patient's immune system have beenattempted, but not with great success. Various cytokines, alone or incombination, such as tumor necrosis factor, interferon gamma, andinterleukin-2 (“IL-2”) have been used to kill cancers, but have notproduced cures. More recently, anti-angiogenic compounds such asthalidomide have been tried in compassionate use cases and shown tocause tumor remission. In animal studies, compounds inducing aprocoagulant state, such as an inhibitor of protein C, have been used tocause tumor remission. New studies have shown that soluble cytokinereceptors, such as tumor necrosis factor receptors (“TNF-Rs”) which arereleased in a soluble form from tumor cells, in high concentrationsrelative to normal cells, may restore the immune system's attack on thetumor cells (Jablonska and Peitruska, Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. (Warsz)1997, 45(5-6), 449-453; Chen, et al., J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1997,56(5), 541-550).

U.S. Pat. No. 4,708,713 to Lentz describes an alternative method fortreating cancer, involving ultrapheresis to remove compounds based onmolecular weight, which promotes an immune attack on the tumors by thepatient's own white cells.

Despite all of these efforts, many patients die from cancer; others areterribly mutilated. It is unlikely that any one therapy will beeffective to cure all types of cancer.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a methodand system for treatment of solid tumors.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method andcompositions that does not involve non-selective, extremely toxic,systemic chemotherapy.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method to treat disorders characterized by production of soluble TNFreceptors, such as many types of cancer, and certain diseases such asHIV, where the disease immunosuppresses the patient, has been developed.Antibodies which bind to TNF receptor, including the soluble TNFreceptor, are administered to the patient in an amount effective toneutralize the molecules which block binding of TNF to the receptor,thereby inducing inflammation. In the preferred embodiment, thepatient's blood is passed through a column having antibodies immobilizedthereon, which bind to and remove the soluble TNF receptor molecules.The process can be performed alone or in combination with othertherapies, including radiation, chemotherapy (local or systemic, forexample, treatments using alkylating agents, doxyrubicin, carboplatinum,cisplatinum, and taxol, and other drugs which may be synergistic ineffect with “unblocked” cytokines: or anti-angiogenic factors.Antibodies may be utilized which are immunoreactive with one or more ofthe following:

tissue necrosis factor receptor-1 (“TNFR-1”), tissue necrosis factorreceptor-2 (“TNFR-2”), interleukin-2 receptor (“IL-2R”), interleukin-1receptor (“IL-1R”), interleukin-6 receptor (“IL-6R”), orinterferon-gamma receptor (“sIFN-gammaR”). The patient is preferablytreated daily for at least three weeks, diagnostic tests conducted toverify that there has been shrinkage of the tumors, then the treatmentregime is repeated as needed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Innate, natural and antigen specific killer mechanisms represent thebest arsenal for dealing with melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo.Central to these cellular destructive mechanisms is tumor necrosisfactor (TNF-), an inflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages andearlier mononuclear cells and TNF-, a related cytokine produced andsecreted by killer T-lymphocytes with highly selective antigen specificreceptors, Old L. J., Antitumor activity of microbial products and tumornecrosis factor, and Bonavida B, et al., (eds): Tumor NecrosisFactor/Cachecin and Related Cytokines, Basell, Karger, 1988. p7;Haranaka K., et al, Cytotoxic activity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) onhuman cancer cells in vitro, Jpn J Exp Med 1981; 51:191; Urban J. L. II,et al., Tumor necrosis factor: A potent effector molecule for tumor cellkilling by activated macrophages, Proc Natl Acad Sce USA 1986; 83-5233;Philip R., et al., Tumor necrosis factor as immunomodulator and mediatorof monocyte cytotoxicity induced by itself, Gamma-interferon andInterleukin-1, Nature 1986; 323:86; Ziegler-Heitbrock H. W., et al.,Tumor necrosis factor as effector molecule in monocyte-mediatedcytotoxicity, Cancer Res 1986; 46:5947; and Feinman R., et al., Tumornecrosis factor is a important mediator of tumor cell killing by humanmonocytes, J Immunol 1987; 138:635. They derive from billions of clones,each with its own specificity. Thus, one clone of these thymus derivedlymphocytes gives rise to T-killer (cytotoxic lymphocytes), or otherfunctional classes each with the one specificity of the parent clone.Their mechanisms are related to both antibody dependent and antibodyindependent cellular tumor toxicity. Receptors for TNF on neoplastic,viral infected, aged cells or those otherwise targeted for destructioncan be both a blessing and a curse. In a positive role, they allowbinding of TNF to the surface for internalization and destruction of thecell. Unfortunately this receptor hypothesis has a double edge. Certainneoplastic cells such as active melanomas secrete large amounts of thesereceptors (sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2) that promptly bind TNF before it can getwithin the vicinity of the cell, Haranaka K., et al, Cytotoxic activityof tumor necrosis factor (TNF) on human cancer cells in vitro, Jpn J ExpMed 1981; 51:191; Urban J. L. II, et al., Tumor necrosis factor: Apotent effector molecule for tumor cell killing by activatedmacrophages, Proc Natl Acad Sce USA 1986; 83-5233; Philip R., et al.,Tumor necrosis factor as immunomodulator and mediator of monocytecytotoxicity induced by itself, Gamma-interferon and Interleukin-1,Nature 1986; 323:86; Ziegler-Heitbrock H. W., et al., Tumor necrosisfactor as effector molecule in monocyte-mediated cytotoxicity, CancerRes 1986; 46:5947; and Feinman R., et al., Tumor necrosis factor is aimportant mediator of tumor cell killing by human monocytes, J Immunol1987; 138:635. This serves as a defense mechanism on the part of thetargeted cell rendering the host immune system ineffective. TNF-R1 andR2 have been characterized with respect to molecular weights (55 and 75kD respectively), Old L. J., Antitumor activity of microbial productsand tumor necrosis factor, and Bonavida B, et al., (eds): Tumor NecrosisFactor/Cachecin and Related Cytokines, Basell, Karger, 1988. p7,Langkopf F., et al., Soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors asprognostic factors in cancer patients, Lancet 1994; 344:57-58; Howard S.T., et al., Vaccinia virus homologues of the Shope fibroma virusinverted terminal repeat proteins and a discontinuous ORF related to thetumor necrosis factor receptor family, Virology 1991; 180:633-664;Mathias S, et al., Activation of the Sphingomyelin signaling pathwayintact EL4 cells and in a cell-free system by IL-1b, Science 1993;259-519-522; and Andrews J. S., et al., Characterization of the receptorfor tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and lymphotoxin LT) on human Tlymphocytes: TNF and LT differ in their receptor binding properties andthe induction of MHC class I proteins on a human CD4+ T cell hybridoma,J Immunol 1990; 144:2582-2591. They serve to both down regulate theimmune response in a normal fashion and overly suppress the immuneresponse as stated above with respect to certain malignancies. They areparticularly abundant, and at high level, in patients with melanoma.

I. Anti-Cytokine Receptor Molecules.

Selective removal or neutralization of the soluble cytokine receptors(which function as inhibitors of the cytokine) can be used to promote aselective, safe inflammatory response against a tumor or cells infectedwith a pathogen such as a virus like HIV or parasite. The neutralizingagent is typically an antibody reactive with the receptor. theantibodies will typically be reactive with both the soluble andimmobilized forms of the receptor. These include soluble tumor necrosisfactor receptor (“sRNF-R”), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (“sIL-2R”),soluble interleukin-1 receptor (“sIL-1R”), soluble interleukin-6receptor (“sIL-6R”), or soluble interferon-gamma receptor(“sIFN-gammaR”). The advantage of selective removal or neutralization isthat the same beneficial effect is obtained in treatment of the disorderbut the treatment is much less expensive and safer since exogenousplasma or albumin does not have to be administered to the patient whenthere is selective removal, as in the case of ultrapheresis and thecytotoxic effects of radiation and chemotherapy are avoided.

The receptors can be removed by binding to the cytokine, an epitopethereof, or an antibody to the receptor. The antibodies to the receptorscan be immobilized in a filter, in a column, or using other standardtechniques for binding reactions to remove proteins from the blood orplasma of a patient, or administered directly to the patient in asuitable pharmaceutically acceptable carrier such as saline. As usedherein, antibody refers to antibody, or antibody fragments (singlechain, recombinant, or humanized), immunoreactive against the receptormolecules. In the most preferred embodiment, the antibody is reactivewith the carboxy-terminus of the shed receptor molecules, thereby avoidconcerns with signal transduction by the receptor is still present onthe cell surface.

Antibodies can be obtained from various commercial sources such asGenzyme Pharmaceuticals. These are preferably humanized for directadministration to a human, but may be of animal origin if immobilized inan extracorporeal device. Antibodies may be monoclonal or polyclonal.The antibodies and device should be sterilized and treated to removeendotoxin and other materials not acceptable for administration to apatient.

Antibodies to the receptor proteins can be generated by standardtechniques, using human receptor proteins. Antibodies are typicallygenerated by immunization of an animal using an adjuvant such asFreund's adjuvant in combination with an immunogenic amount of theprotein administered over a period of weeks in two to three weekintervals, then isolated from the serum, or used to make hybridomaswhich express the antibodies in culture. Because the methods forimmunizing animals yield antibody which is not of human origin, theantibodies could elicit an adverse effect if administered to humans.Methods for “humanizing” antibodies, or generating less immunogenicfragments of non-human antibodies, are well known. A humanized antibodyis one in which only the antigen-recognized sites, orcomplementarily-determining hypervariable regions (CDRs) are ofnon-human origin, whereas all framework regions (FR) of variable domainsare products of human genes. These “humanized” antibodies present alesser xenographic rejection stimulus when introduced to a humanrecipient.

To accomplish humanization of a selected mouse monoclonal antibody, theCDR grafting method described by Daugherty, et al., (1991) Nucl. AcidsRes., 19:2471-2476, incorporated herein by reference, may be used.Briefly, the variable region DNA of a selected animal recombinantanti-idiotypic ScFv is sequenced by the method of Clackson, T., et al.,(1991) Nature, 352:624-688, incorporated herein by reference. Using thissequence, animal CDRs are distinguished from animal framework regions(FR) based on locations of the CDRs in known sequences of animalvariable genes. Kabat, H. A., et al., Sequences of Proteins ofImmunological Interest, 4^(th) Ed. (U.S. Dept. Health and HumanServices, Bethesda, Md., 1987). Once the animal CDRs and FR areidentified, the CDRs are grafted onto human heavy chain variable regionframework by the use of synthetic oligonucleotides and polymerase chainreaction (PCR) recombination. Codons for the animal heavy chain CDRs, aswell as the available human heavy chain variable region framework, arebuilt in four (each 100 bases long) oligonucleotides. Using PCR, agrated DNA sequence of 400 bases is formed that encodes for therecombinant animal CDR/human heavy chain FR protection.

The immunogenic stimulus presented by the monoclonal antibodies soproduced may be further decreased by the use of Pharmacia's (PharmaciaLKB Biotechnology, Sweden) “Recombinant Phage Antibody System” (RPAS),which generated a single-chain Fv fragment (ScFv) which incorporates thecomplete antigen-binding domain of the antibody. In the RPAS, antibodyvariable heavy and light chain genes are separately amplified from thehybridoma mRNA and cloned into an expression vector. The heavy and lightchain domains are co-expressed on the same polypeptide chain afterjoining with a short linker DNA which codes for a flexible peptide. Thisassembly generated a single-chain Fv fragment (ScFv) which incorporatesthe complete antigen-binding domain of the antibody. Compared to theintact monoclonal antibody, the recombinant ScFv includes a considerablylower number of epitopes, and thereby presents a much weaker immunogenicstimulus when injected into humans.

The antibodies can be formulated in standard pharmaceutical carriers foradministration to patients in need thereof. These include saline,phosphate buffered saline, and other aqueous carriers, and liposomes,polymeric microspheres and other controlled release deliver devices, asare well known in the art. The antibodies can also be administered withadjuvant, such as muramyl dipeptide or other materials approved for usein humans (Freund's adjuvant can be used for administration of antibodyto animals). In the preferred embodiment, antibodies are immobilized toa solid support, such as the SEPHAROSE™ column in the examples, usingstandard techniques such as cyanogen bromide or commercially availablekits for coupling of proteins to membranes formed of materials such asnitrocellulose or polycarbonate.

Treatment is conducted over a period of time until a positive indicationis observed. This is typically based on diagnostic tests which show thatthere has been some reduction in tumor size or which suggests tumorinflammation. The patient is preferably treated daily for three weeks,diagnostic tests conducted to verity that there has been shrinkage ofthe tumors and/or inflammation, then the treatment regime is repeated.

Surgical (or vacuum) removal of necrotic material may be required priorto or during treatment to avoid toxicity associated with high tumorburden.

II. Treatment with Adjuvant Therapies

It would clearly be advantageous to cause complete remissions. Based onthe presumed mechanism that the process is removing immune inhibitorsproduced by the tumors, especially inhibitors of cytokines and otherimmune mediators, it is possible to treat the patients with adjuvant orcombination therapies, that enhance the results achieved with theant6ibodies to TNF receptors. These include anti-angiogenic compounds,such as thalidomide, procoagulant compounds, cytokines and otherimmunostimulants. Standard chemotherapeutic agents and/or radiation canalso be used with the ultrapheresis with the antibody treatment.

A. Anti-Angiogenic Compounds

Any anti-angiogenic compound can be used. Exemplary anti-angiogeniccompounds include O-substituted fumagillol and derivatives thereof, suchas TNP-470, described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,135,919, 5,698,586, and5,290,807 to Kishimoto, et al.; angiostatin and endostatin, described inU.S. Pat. No. 5,290,807, 5,639,725 and 5,733,876 to O'Reilly;thalidomide, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,629,327 and 5,712,291 toD'Amato; and other compounds, such as the anti-invasive factor, retinoicacid, and paclitaxel, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,716,981 to Hunter, etal., and the metalloproteinase inhibitors described in U.S. Pat. No.5,713,491 to Murphy, et al. Thalidomide is administered once daily, 200mg orally.

B. Procoagulant Compounds

Protein C is a vitamin K-dependent plasma protein zymogen to a serineprotease. Upon activation it becomes a potent anticoagulant. Activatedprotein C acts through the specific proteolysis of the procoagulantcofactors, factor VIIIa and factor Va. This activity requires thepresence of another vitamin K-dependent protein, protein S, calcium anda phospholipid (presumably cellular) surface. As described in Hemostasisand Thrombosis: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice 2nd Ed., Colman,R. W., et al., p. 263 (J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pa. 1987),protein C circulates in a two-chain form, with the larger, heavy chainbound to the smaller light chain through a single disulfide link.Protein C is activated to activated protein C (APC). Thrombin is capableof activating protein C by the specific cleavage of the Arg¹²-Leu¹³ bondin the heavy chain. In vivo, in the presence of physiologicalconcentrations of calcium, the rate of this activation is enhanceddramatically when thrombin is bound to the endothelial cell cofactor,thrombomodulin. Matschiner, et al., Current Advances in Vitamin KResearch, pp. 135-140, John W. Suttie, ed. (Elsevier Science PublishingCo., Inc. 1988) have further reviewed the role of the Vitamin Kdependent proteins in coagulation.

Blockage of the natural anticoagulant pathways, in particular theprotein C pathway, uses the natural procoagulant properties of the tumorto target the tumor capillaries for microvascular thrombosis, leading tohemorrhagic necrosis of the tumor, as described in U.S. Pat. No.5,147,638 to Esmon, et al. Examples of such compounds includeanti-protein C and anti-protein S.

C. Cytokines

The biologic activity and clinical effectiveness of pro-inflammatorycytokines is augmented by ultrapheresis in the patient with cancer andother states of acquired immune tolerance Specifically, both TNF alphaand TNF beta, in doses of between approximately 100 to 500 microgramsper meter squared body surface area (M2BSA), can enhance the immunereaction in aggressive tumors. Monocyte and lymphocyte activation isaugmented by INF-alpha, INF-beta and gamma. The IL-1 and IL-2 receptorantagonists are removed by ultrapheresis and thereby upregulate the invivo activity of these cytokines. An 80 kD glycoprotein, which isresponsible for inhibiting blastoid transformation in advancedmalignancy, chronic infectious disease and pregnancy, has recently beenfound, and appears to be responsible for the loss of delayedhypersensitivity reactions in these diseases, which is removed by thisprocess. This is significant because in removing this type ofsuppression, vaccines of all types will work better. Dosage regimes forIFN-alpha and beta are 3 M units subcutaneous three times a week up to20 M units/M2 BSA daily. Interferon-gamma is administered in a dosage ofbetween 100 to 1000 micgms per day.

D. Chemotherapeutic Agents

Preferred chemotherapeutic agents are those which are synergistic withTNF, for example, alkylating agents, doxyrubicin, carboplatinum,cisplatinum, and tomoxifen. Tamoxifen plays a role not only in blockingof estrogen receptors but also certain growth factor receptors such asepidermal derived growth factor (“EDGF”), fibroblast derived growthfactor (“FDGF”), tumor derived growth factor (“TDGF”), TDGF-β andplatelet derived growth factor (“PDGF”) and therefore may becomplementary to inflammation against cancers provoked by ultrapheresis.

E. Radiation

Radiation therapy is destructive of normal tissue, causing tumors to diepartially by an inflammatory attack. Ultrapheresis allows the use oflower doses of radiation to kill residual tumor cells and spare normaltissue. In a preferred method, ultrapheresis is used as the initialtherapy, followed by radiation at approximately one-half of the normaldosages. It is well established that TNF kills tumor cells by generatingfree oxygen radicals, hydroxyl radicals and halide ions, and thatradiation therapy generates carbonium ions in tissue. Therefore thecombination of the two is more effective in killing cancer cells thaneither alone.

III. EXAMPLES Example 1 Treatment of a Patient with Ultrapheresis havingAntibodies Immobilized on the Filter

Materials and Methods

Monoclonal antibody was obtained from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.,and purified for administration to a patient. This antibody is reactivewith TNF R1 and R2 inhibitors.

A filtration system was assembled using an Eva Flux 4 A filter as theprimary filter to remove ultrafiltrate containing these inhibitors fromthe cancer patient's blood. Monoclonal antibody in a dose of 1 mg perliter of normal ultrafiltrate of the monoclonal antibody and 1 mg of the$2 monoclonal antibody were added to that replacement solution. In thiscircuit the ultrafiltrate of the initial 4 A filter was delivered by aseparate blood pump to a Kuraray 3 A filter. The retentate of the 3Afilter was then discarded and the ultrafiltrate of the 3A filter wasmetered back into the filtered blood from the 4 A filter as replacementsolution. To make the discard; i.e., the retentate of the 3 A filter,normal ultrafiltrate with monoclonal antibody added to it was meteredinto the intra circuit between the 4 A and 3 A filters.

Results

Addition of the monoclonal antibodies to ultrafiltrated cancer sera thatpossess elevated levels of the inhibitors decreases the level ofdetectable inhibitor by Elias Assay to zero.

Addition of the monoclonal antibodies to the replacement fluid followingultrapheresis led to an increased reduction of both the soluble receptorto TNF R1 and R2 in the ultrafiltrate of the second filter.

The purpose of this was to test whether or not this murine monoclonalantibody could capture the inhibitor and aid in its removal from bloodsince the complex of antibody and antigen could not pass through thepores of the 3 A filter and thus be discarded in the retentate of the 3Afilter. This was considerably more effective than the single separationtechnique and replacement with normal ultrafiltrate. There was also aheightened tumor specific inflammatory response by doing this and anincreased rate of tumor destruction. These experiments strongly indicatethat the monoclonal antibody, preferably humanized to 97% to 99% humanform by substituting human constant regions for human constant regionson the antibody, preserve its capturing and neutralizing capability withthe murine variable regions of the antibody and use the antibody as thetherapeutic drug in clinical trials with a very high expectation that itwould neutralize soluble receptors to TNF and cause tumor destruction ina human.

Example 2 Treatment of a Patient with mAb to TNF Receptors

A patient with vaginal metastasis of colon cancer was treated for oneweek with a three hour infusion of monoclonal antibody to TNF receptor 1and TNF receptor 2. This led to a 75% reduction in the tumor size withinone week.

Example 3 Treatment of Melanoma Patient

A procedure is described in case report form, that utilizes apheresisand immunological affinity chromatography to treat a melanoma patientwith short term need and weakening long term prognosis.

Previous studies utilizing ultrafiltration, with selective pore sievingby passing patient's plasma through cartridges, have been shown toreduce sTNF-R1 and R2 levels. The period of this procedure seems to beof sufficient length to allow TNF to rebound and selectively produceapoptosis or membrane disarray of melanoma cells, Gatanaga T., et al.,Identification of TNF-LT blocking factor(s) in the serum andultrafiltrates of human cancer patients, Lymphokine Res 1990; 9:225-9.Instead of using ultrafiltrate cartridges, this apheresis system wascoupled to Sepharose® gel columns in parallel, one of which containedmonoclonal human anti TNF-R1 and the second anti TNF-R2. The concept ofaffinity chromatography preparations has been technically available forprotein separation and purification, and improved upon over the past 30years, Ey, P. L., et al., Isolation of pure IgG₁, IgG_(2a), andIgG_(2b). immunoglobulins from mouse serum using protein A-Sepharose,Immunochemistry 1978; 15:429-436. This type of device represents one ofthe few examples of linking in vivo production of TNF inhibitors to invitro removal and return of the purified extracted plasma to the patientto prevent fluid reduction.

The patient is a 55 year old Russian gentleman with metastatic melanoma.The patient smoked 2-3 packs of cigarettes a day for some 20 years. Hequit this habit several years ago. He was also a heavy alcohol user inyears past but had decreased his intake to 1-2 glasses of wine a day.Review of his medications on this date revealed methylprednisolone 4 mgin AM and 4 mg in PM. Apparently this was being taken as replacementtherapy for adrenal cortical suppression that was graded iatrogenicallyat the time of the treatment of his alveolitis (see below). He wasadditionally taking narcotic analgesics. As a child he suffered theusual childhood diseases, denies rheumatic fever, scarlet fever ordiphtheria. As an adult he has had no major medical illnesses save thosedescribed above. He has had no other major surgeries in the past and hasno known allergies.

His history of present illness began in November of 1995 when he notedgrowth of a right facial naevus which bled and enlarged over the periodof one year. This was treated initially by cryotherapy. It regrew withintwo months and was excised. Histology was that of a malignant melanoma(Clark's level unknown). Staging work up at the time was negative andincluded CT scans of the head, neck, chest and abdomen. He remaineddisease free until March of 1996 when he developed right cervical andright submental adenopathy. Preoperative CT scan of the head, neck,chest and abdomen confirmed the right cervical adenopathy but revealedno other sites of metastases. In June of 1996 he underwent re-excisionwith a right radical neck dissection. In this material, one lymph nodewas histologically confirmed to involve melanoma. The patient wastreated with a course of Vindesine 3 mg/m² every three weeks,Dacarbazine 100 mg/m² every three weeks for four cycles. He subsequentlydeveloped cutaneous metastases in the skin of his left shoulder,multiple metastases to the scars within the left anterolateral neck andmultiple axillary metastases treated with fifteen subsequent excisionsof recurrent metastases. In March of 1999 he was offered a trial ofInterleukin-2 but on this developed severe pulmonary toxicity that had aprotracted course and was diagnosed as idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis.Interleukin-2 was discontinued and he received radiation therapy to hisright neck and axilla for six weeks beginning in the month of May 1999.He developed low back pain in August of 1999. Work up in October of 1999revealed bone metastasis of the vertebral body of T-11 and subsequentMRI revealed a lytic destructive process in the right transverse processand pedicle of the 11^(th) thoracic vertebra, as well as completereplacement of the vertebral body at T-11. Additional metastases wereappreciated in the vertebral body of the 9^(th) thoracic vertebral aswell as the 10th. Also there was involvement of L-1 and L-2 vertebralbodies. Tumor seen again on the Mar. 16, 2000 MRI revealed growthposteriorly from the mid body of the 11^(th) thoracic vertebral into thespinal canal by 7.4 to 7.8 mm with posterior displacement of the spinalcord. CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis revealed possiblemultiple liver metastases but no other suggestion of visceralmetastases.

The patient was then considered for a trial of UltraPheresis™ in aneffort to reduce solubilized receptors to tumor necrosis factor, bothsTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2. As facilities for the application of this form ofsemi-selective plasma exchange did not exist in Moscow at this time,affinity column separation of inhibitors was explored. Monoclonalantibodies against sTNF-R1 and R2 delivered to the Cardiology ResearchCenter in Moscow for Dr. Sergei N. Petrovsky, PhD, head of the group forAffinity Sorbents for Medicine, Pocard, Ltd,. 3-rd Cherepkovskaya str.,15a, Moscow, 121552, Russia. Ninety milligrams of anti sTNF-R1monoclonal antibody and 180 mg of anti sTNF-R2 monoclonal antibody werethen bound with sterile Sepharose® using cyanogen bromide in a glasscolumn previously described for use in the lipopack cholesterolabsorbent column technology. The particular methodology used is welldescribed and is commercially available in Russia for the development ofthese LDL absorbent columns. The columns were prepared under sterileconditions in a GSIO 9,001 facility. They were subjected to endotoxintesting, viral, fungal and bacterial cultures, and prepared for humanuse under written Informed Consent and under approval of the KremlinPresident's Hospital Medical Center.

On May 2, 2000 the patient's physical examination was that of awell-developed, well-nourished male who appeared his stated years.Examination of his head revealed a normal hair distribution and texture.His tympanic membranes and external auditory canals were clear. Thesclerae and conjunctivae were clear. The pupils were round, reactive tolight and accommodation. EOM intact. Funduscopic examination was normal.He had a healed graft over his right inferior cheek and extensivescarring over the right anterolateral neck consistent with his historyof prior right radical neck dissection. There were no demonstrablepathologic masses within the skin, the scar, or pathologic nodesappreciated either in the cervical nodes or the supraclavicular fossaebilaterally. His lungs were clear to ausculation and percussion. Hisprecordium demonstrated a non-displaced PMI, a normal S1 and S2 withoutgallop, murmur or rub. With the right arm exhibited there was3+lymphedema. The right axilla was poorly examined due to extensivescarring in that area but no palpable nodes were appreciated. Hisabdomen was mildly obese. His liver and spleen were normal to physicalexamination. His axillary lymphatics were unremarkable. The genitaliawas that of a normal mature male without pathologic mass. The lowerextremities revealed no edema, cyanosis or clubbing and exhibited fullROM. His neurologic examination included a normal mental status. Cranialnerves 2-12 were intact. His DTR's were 2+ and symmetric. Motor andsensory testing was normal. His cerebellar examination revealed nodysmetria, dysarthria or dysdiadochokinesia. He was essentially confinedto bed due to back pain only, but was able to roll from left to rightwithout assistance. He had been confined to a wheelchair for theantecedent two months due to back pain and was wearing a back bracewhich was removed for physical exam.

His laboratory parameters included a hemoglobin of 8.8 gms, WBC 2,800with normal differential. His platelet count was 121,000. Thecomprehensive metabolic panel was unremarkable and alkaline phosphatasewas normal.

An MRI scan of the patient's 11th thoracic vertebral body revealed amass placing pressure on the spinal cord. This was taken during the weekprior to intensive therapy started in April of 2000 and continuingthrough May.

On the first day an 18 gauge plastic cannula was inserted in the leftantecubital vein. A second was established in the right greatersaphenous vein of the leg. The patient was connected to a standard CobeSpectra centrifically based plasma separator. Six hundred cc's of plasmawas then harvested and replaced with 5% albumin in saline. The patient'splasma was then pumped over column one which contained 45 mg of antisTNF-R1 monoclonal antibody and then passed to column two whichcontained 90 mg of anti sTNF-R2 monoclonal antibody. The material elutedfrom the column was then analyzed for the level of each inhibitor stillin the plasma and 50 cc's of that plasma was then injected into thepatient at the end of pheresis to look for any febrile reactions orallergic reactions. He tolerated this with no apparent clinical adverseeffect.

Subsequent analyses of the patient's plasma and the eluate of the columnrevealed that the column was able to capture essentially all of theinhibitor presented to it in this 600 ml plasma volume. The patient wasmaintained in the hospital over night and on the morning of the 4th ofMay, he was brought from hospital room back to the apheresis suite. Hehad a comfortable evening and ate a normal dinner and breakfast. TheIV's were re-established in the same sites. The patient was re-attachedto the Cobe Spectra machine and on this date, 3 liters of plasma washarvested and delivered to the columns as described above in acontinuous fashion until 3 liters of plasma was treated.

His R1 level before treatment was 1500 and after treatment was 1450. HisR2 level before treatment was 5000 and after treatment was 3800 on thisdate. Again he tolerated the procedure well with no clinical adverseeffect and no increase in pain in his back.

On the third day the 6th of May, the treatment was repeated. Threeliters of plasma were again pheresed over the columns in an identicalfashion as described above. His pretreatment R1 was 2300, post treatmentR1 was 1600. Pretreatment R2 was 5200, post treatment R2 was 3200. Atthe end of each treatment the columns were washed with glycine buffer ata pH of 2.5 to elute the bound inhibitor from them and measure themquantitatively. It was determined that at these amounts of treatedplasma the columns were not saturated and significant quantities ofinhibitor removed.

His fourth treatment was on the 7th of May. He was increased to 4 litersof treated plasma. The procedures were repeated each day with gradualescalations in amount of plasma treated to a maximum treated plasma of 8liters on the May 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, and 14th. On May 16^(th), twocolumns were used in parallel, thus increasing the amount of plasmadelivered to each column remained at 30 mls per minute, for a total of60 mls of plasma per minute. This resulted in a pretreatment R1 of 2600and a post treatment of 1700. R2 pretreatment was 4250 and went to posttreatment of 2700.

He was subsequently treated with 8 liters of plasma a day using thedouble column method. On the 21st of May he had a repeat CAT scan of hisspine which revealed complete resolution of tumor. Three days afterthat, May 24th, he had a repeat MRI which was compared to thepretreatment MRI and confirmed a complete response. The patient wasfollowed carefully in the hospital by his attending physicians as wellas attending neurosurgeons, who followed him on a daily basis concernedabout tumor bleeding or tumor swelling in his tight and anatomicallydangerous places but fortunately the patient enjoyed a complete responsewith no apparent adverse effect.

For the details of daily treatment in terms of volumes, columns, bloodflow rates and plasma flow rates see Table 1.

The patient has enjoyed an apparent complete response without anysignificant adverse effect. He was able to get up and walk after thefourth procedure. Two additional courses were planned in an endeavor toconsolidate this response. This case is consistent with the observationsthat a salutatory tumor response can be achieved in melanoma by removingsolubilized receptors to TNF. This column is so specific that it removesonly sTNF-R1 and R2 and that is the only explanation for the responsethat this man has had from an oncologic point of view. A profound columnyield was observed on the third treatment day for sTNF-R2 withmodulation for the remaining treatment days throughout this fifteen daycourse. R1 peaked on treatment day 7 with the total amount removed of 6million pg. This also modulated throughout the course of treatments butnever approached the 16 million mark set by sTNF-R2.

Radiographic examination on the day following his first fifteen daycourse of apheresis with anti R1 and anti R2 affinity column extractionrevealed no melanoma and considerable reduction of the lesion at the 4thlumbar vertebral body. Currently the patient remains active, with goodappetite, is walking normally and his back pain is much improved. He haspositive anticipation for his second course of apheretic treatments.

Example 4 Production of Polyclonal Antibodies to STNF R1 and R2Preparation of Column for Treatment of Patients

Polyclonal antibodies were produced in New Zealand white rabbitsinjected with recombinant antigen, soluble tumor necrosis factorreceptor (“STNF”) R1 and R, injected into the rabbit on a standardimmunization protocol, then boosted. 200 mg of polyclonal antibody maybe produced against STNF R1 and R2, per liter. The animals will be bledmonthly. 200 mg of antibody can be bound safely to 200 mg of AHSEPHAROSE™ beads. The binding is done with ethanolamine and periodate.Binding is therefore excellent. This matrix is then placed in a 200 mgpolycarbonate column. Each step is done in an aseptic fashion and thefinal product is then terminally sterilized with standard radiationprotocols and subjected to USDA standard testing for pyrogen andinfectious agents.

This amount of antibody is enough to remove STNF R1 and STNF R2 in humanextracellular water sufficient to reduce the level of 10,000 pg per mlto under 1,000 pg per ml in two to three hours of plasma exchange.

The use of the columns to reduce inhibitor levels to less than 1000pg/ml over a period of at least three weeks has resulted in remissionsof between 40 and 90% in non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer andmelanoma patients. It is therefore predictable that the treatmentresults in a rather consistent tumor specific inflammatory response andthe majority of patients having the most common tumor types, includingbreast, small cell lung, colon, ovarian, hepatic, melanoma, and renalcell carcinoma as well as ovarian and endometrial cancers should respondto the treatment. In combination with antibodies against vascularendothelial growth factor receptor and/or epidermal growth factorreceptor and/or antibodies against fibroblast derived growth factor andtransforming growth factor receptor, either singularly or incombination, the treatment is expected to produce excellent responses inthese tumor types and may play a role in the clinical management ofhematopoietic disorders as well.

The methods and systems disclosed herein are useful for treatment ofpatients with cancer, immune-mediated disorders, chronic parasitism,some viral diseases especially viral diseases such as HIV which causeimmunosuppresion, and other disorders characterized by elevated levelsof TNF receptors or inhibitors to IL-2, IL-6, gamma interferon, or otherpro-inflammatory signals as well as white cell activation. An exampledemonstrates efficacy in treating a cancer patient.

Modifications and variations of the method and compositions describedherein will be obvious to those skilled in the art. Such modificationsand variations are intended to come within the scope of the appendedclaims.

1. A method for inducing an immune response against transformed,infected or diseased tissue in a patient comprising contacting theblood, plasma or one or more components of the blood of a patient inneed thereof with a column or filter having immobilized thereinmolecules binding to soluble cytokine receptor molecules, wherein thecytokine is selected from the group consisting of GM-CSF,erythropoietin, thrombopoetin, G-CSF, M-CSF and SCF, wherein the bindingmolecules are selected from the group consisting of antibodies orantibody fragments and soluble cytokine molecules, wherein binding ofthe soluble cytokine receptors prevents the soluble cytokine receptorsfrom binding to cytokines in the tissue to be treated, until an immuneresponse is induced in the transformed, infected, or diseased tissue. 2.The method of claim 1 wherein the tissue is a solid tumor.
 3. The methodof claim 1 wherein the disease is a viral or parasitic disease causingimmunosuppression.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the molecule is anantibody to the soluble cytokine receptor.
 5. The method of claim 1further comprising treating the tissue with an agent selected from thegroup consisting of anti-angiogenic compounds, procoagulant compounds,cytokines, chemotherapeutic agents, and radiation.
 6. (canceled)
 7. Themethod of claim 1 wherein the soluble cytokine receptor molecules areselected from the group consisting of soluble tissue factor receptor 1(“sTNFR-1”) and soluble tissue necrosis factor receptor-2 (“sTNFR-2”).8. The method of claim 1 wherein the cytokine receptor molecules areremoved by binding to antibodies or antibody fragments immunoreactivewith the cytokine receptor molecules.
 9. The method of claim 8 whereinthe soluble cytokine receptor molecules or antibodies or antibodyfragments are immobilized in a filter or column through which thepatient's blood or plasma or one or more components thereof iscirculated prior to being returned to the patient.
 10. The method ofclaim 4 wherein the antibodies are humanized.
 11. The method of claim 1comprising contacting the blood, plasma or components thereof withantibodies or antibody fragments immobilized in a sterile endotoxin freeextracorporeal device. 12-16. (canceled)